John Norquist’s Case for Congestion
John Norquist, president and CEO of the Congress for the New Urbanism, wrote a recent piece in the Atlantic Cities entitled The Case for Congestion. In it, he sensibly explains that cities must recognize that traffic and congestion are often a sign of dynamism, and by moving traffic too well, cities often drive out economic potential that “good congestion” provides. Most of all, he argues that it’s time to retire the highway in an urban context – I couldn’t agree more.
Norquist has long argued that, like good and bad cholesterol, there is such thing as good and bad congestion. He’s right, and it’s time for the rest of us to recognize that.
1 Comment
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
[…] Minnehaha Avenue may be good for business (more potential customers), even if that creates more congestion (this can be a good thing). A road built to accommodate 25% more traffic may actually be detrimental to business and […]
Pingback by Joe Urban » Blog Archive » A Minnehaha Avenue for All — September 25, 2013 @ 9:50 pm